Close Menu
Board Gamers AnonymousBoard Gamers Anonymous

    Subscribe to Updates

    Subscribe for updates from BGA, new episodes and more

    What's Hot

    Episode 558 – AI in Tabletop Gaming: The Wall-E Paradox

    December 17, 2025

    Episode 557 – Your Ideal Tabletop Convention: Past Highlights & Future Wishes

    December 10, 2025

    Episode 556 – Top Convention Library Games: Pax Unplugged & BGG

    December 3, 2025
    Facebook Instagram YouTube Spotify Bluesky LinkedIn Discord
    Board Gamers AnonymousBoard Gamers Anonymous Saturday, December 20
    • About
    • Contact
    • Review Policy
    • Merch
    Facebook Instagram YouTube Spotify Bluesky LinkedIn Discord
    Subscribe
    • BGA Podcast
    • Tabletop Toys
    • Board Game Academics
    • Reviews
    • Top Lists
    • Support on Patreon
      • Backers
    Board Gamers AnonymousBoard Gamers Anonymous
    Home » Mad Science Foundation Review
    Reviews

    Mad Science Foundation Review

    AnthonyBy AnthonySeptember 29, 2016No Comments6 Mins Read0 Views
    Facebook LinkedIn Copy Link Email Bluesky
    Follow Us
    Facebook YouTube Spotify Bluesky Discord
    Share
    Facebook LinkedIn Email Copy Link Bluesky

     

    One of a handful of new releases at Gen Con this year for Cryptozoic, Mad Science Foundation, designed by Sharang Biswas and Max Seidman, is a straightforward set collection and drafting game with a bit of variable powers mixed in for good measure. It’s on the lighter end of the spectrum, and despite the size of the box (which we’ll get to), it’s small, short, and easy to setup and learn.

    img_1464

    Thematically speaking, I like it. There really aren’t that many games in this genre – not that it’s a massive genre to draw from, but it’s still a fun one. Goofy mad scientists building over the top laboratories and inventions in their bid to take over the world. It’s good, goofy fun, and the artwork in this game, as well as the thematic pairing of the location names is entertaining the first couple of plays through.

    The game itself is incredibly light, though, and the big question is whether that relatively thin layer of gameplay holds up the cleverly themed components.

    How Mad Science Foundation Plays

    Mad Science Foundation consists almost entirely of cards with a handful of standees the scoreboard in the center of the table. At the start of the game, each player will be given a quirk card facedown. This is there variable bonus for the end of the game – the one thing they want to do that will generate extra victory points.

    img_1463

    Then each player will receive a headquarters card face up. Like the invention cards you’ll be getting very shortly, this card starts the game sideways as a prototype. That means it needs to be built. To build this (or any of the inventions you draw later), you need to match the symbols at the bottom of the card with the resource cards you’ll be drawing soon.

    During setup, you’ll also tweak a couple of things based on player account. The number of cards in the deck, the availability of one of the minions (the Overworked Researcher Minion), and the general layout will be adjusted depending on whether you have 2,3, or 4 players. Finally, you’ll give the Crooked Director to the oldest player who will gain control over it for the first round.

    Each round, the Crooked Director will draw 1 Invention Card and resource cards based on the number of players (between 3-5). If you pull one of the minions out of the resource deck, you’ll draw another resource to replace it. The Crooked Director will then split up all this loot into separate piles (equal to the number of players), after which they are drafted, the Crooked Director choosing last. So it’s not a great idea for the Director to make one pile better than the rest – it will only get scooped up faster.

    img_1462

     

    As you gather resources, you will use them to construct inventions, activate inventions that cost resources, or stockpile for endgame scoring (if it matches your quirk). You can also get minions that add some extra fun to the game – free points, wild resources, or blocking the opponents inventions from activating. The crooked director also goes into the pile and becomes something people can choose for their draft action.

    When the invention deck is empty, the round finishes and everyone counts up their points, including Quirk points. The player with the most Infamy wins.

    What We Like About Mad Science Foundation

    This is a fairly quick game. It takes less than 45 minutes to play with the full player count, there aren’t too many tough decisions, and as long as players don’t get too buried in decision making when picking their cards, the game will move along nicely.

    img_1489

    The inventions are a lot of fun too as you read through and activate them, even if they can feel samey at a certain point. The theme comes through nicely here and it is fun to work through the decks and compete over the resources, inventions, and minions needed at any given time.

    We had fun pretending to be nefarious evil scientists and fighting over resources as they were made available. It’s a lot of fun to watch the Crooked Director work too, giving them grief and hoping the piles work in your favor.

    Issues with Mad Science Foundation

    As fun as the theme and artwork here is, the game starts to drag pretty fast. The resources in the deck are fairly generic – color coded for Cryptonium, Lasers, Dark Matter and Sharks. After a while, you stop paying attention to what each resource is or does and just start looking at colors and matching symbols.

    At the same time, there are several Infamy gaining options that just don’t trigger very often. If the right resources don’t come out of the deck, you may not get to do very much for several turns at a time and because it’s a table-wide draft, you may spend 2-3 turns not getting what you need if someone else also needs it. It’s not fun when two players compete for a large number of the same resources.

    img_1479

    The Crooked Director role is a lot of fun, but it can also bog things down and put pressure on a player to balance things as much as possible, which can lead to AP. I said the game shouldn’t take more than 45 minutes, but it certainly has a few times as players just got stuck, trying not get left out with NOTHING they actually needed. The result of all this is that planning is tough, and strategy tougher. You work with what you can get.

    And on a non-gameplay related-note, the box size for this game is unnecessarily large. This could easily fit in a small tuckbox. When you open the box, the components are shoved into a small compartment 1/5 the size of the box. The board doesn’t need to be as big as it is either – it’s a small thing, but comically mismatched.

    The Bottom Line

    The Mad Science Foundation is a fun little game, but it doesn’t have the depth or the variability needed to make it a long-standing member of most gaming rotations. The potential blockage due to the single table draft, the AP that can cripple the Crooked Director player and the nature of the resource to Invention makeup just don’t quite come together in a satisfying enough way.

     

    Follow on Facebook Follow on Instagram Follow on YouTube Follow on Spotify Follow on Bluesky Follow on LinkedIn Follow on Discord
    Share. Facebook LinkedIn Email Copy Link Bluesky
    Anthony

    Anthony lives and plays games in Philadelphia, PA. A lover of complex strategy, two-player war games, and area control, Anthony is always eager to try a new game, even if he's on rule-reading duty.

    Related Posts

    Review of Nightshift by Exotic Cancer

    October 13, 2025

    Love, Career, & Magic Review

    February 17, 2025

    Dungeons and Feelings Review

    September 12, 2024
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • LinkedIn
    • Spotify
    • Bluesky

    Subscribe to Updates

    Join the BGA newsletter for updates, opportunities and more.

    Recent Episodes

    Episode 557 – Your Ideal Tabletop Convention: Past Highlights & Future Wishes

    December 10, 202517 Views

    Episode 558 – AI in Tabletop Gaming: The Wall-E Paradox

    December 17, 202513 Views

    Episode 518 – New Theme, Same Great Game!

    March 12, 20255 Views

    Episode 534 – Let them Fight: Andromeda’s Edge vs. Dwellings of Eldervale

    July 3, 20254 Views
    Top Articles

    Review of Nightshift by Exotic Cancer

    October 13, 20256 Mins Read7 Views

    I first heard about Nightshift by Exotic Cancer online and immediately wanted to play it.…

    Love, Career, & Magic Review

    February 17, 2025

    Anthony’s Top 10 Games of 2024

    January 16, 2025

    61 Most Anticipated Board Games of 2025

    January 8, 2025
    About Us
    About Us

    Board Gamers Anonymous is a network of board game lovers who write, record and publish reviews and articles about their favorite games. Featuring a weekly podcast, weekly written reviews, and an active YouTube channel, BGA is the place to be for all board game content. If you have a question about any of our publications or would like to submit an article tip or game for review, you can contact us here.

    Facebook YouTube Spotify Bluesky LinkedIn Discord
    Recent Episodes

    Episode 558 – AI in Tabletop Gaming: The Wall-E Paradox

    December 17, 2025

    Episode 557 – Your Ideal Tabletop Convention: Past Highlights & Future Wishes

    December 10, 2025

    Episode 556 – Top Convention Library Games: Pax Unplugged & BGG

    December 3, 2025
    Popular Articles

    Review of Nightshift by Exotic Cancer

    October 13, 20257 Views

    Love, Career, & Magic Review

    February 17, 202519 Views

    Anthony’s Top 10 Games of 2024

    January 16, 202510 Views
    • BGA Podcast
    • Reviews
    • Kickstarter
    • Featured
    • Review Policy
    • Advertise with Us
    © 2025 Board Gamers Anonymous LLC.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.